Sunday, April 23, 2017

Putin Ordered Effort to Help Trump, Hurt Clinton: US Report

By on January 6, 2017

President-elect Donald Trump, left, departs a meeting at the Condé Nast offices at One World Trade Center in New York, Friday, Jan. 6, 2017. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

President-elect Donald Trump, left, departs a meeting at the Condé Nast offices at One World Trade Center in New York, Friday, Jan. 6, 2017. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

WASHINGTON – Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a hidden campaign to influence America’s presidential election in favor of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, U.S. intelligence agencies declared Friday in the government’s first formal allegation in support of sensational claims that Trump and his supporters have staunchly resisted.

The intelligence report, an unclassified version of a more-detailed classified account given earlier to Trump, the White House and congressional leaders, withheld any evidence to back up its assertions. The president-elect said after his own meeting with the nation’s top intelligence officials that it was clear Russian email hacking did not deliver him the presidency.

There was no suggestion that Russia affected actual vote counting or tampered with ballot machines, said the unclassified version, which was the most explicit account to date of Russian efforts to interfere with the U.S. political process. But the report said Russia’s actions included hacking into the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee and individual Democrats including Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, and using state-funded propaganda and paid “trolls” to make nasty comments on social media services.

The unclassified version included footnotes acknowledging that it “does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.” But it said its conclusions were identical to the classified version, which was more detailed.

The first page of the Joint Analysis Report narrative by the Department of Homeland Security and federal Bureau of Investigation and released on Dec. 29, 2016, is photographed in Washington, Jan. 6, 2017. Computer security specialists say the technical details in the narrative that the U.S. said would show whether computers had been infiltrated by Russian intelligence services were poorly done and potentially dangerous. Cybersecurity firms ended up counseling their customers to proceed with extreme caution after a slew of false positives led back to sites such as Amazon and Yahoo Inc. Companies and organizations were following the government’s advice Dec. 29 and comparing digital logs recording incoming network traffic to their computers and finding matches to a list of hundreds of internet addresses the Homeland Security Department had identified as indicators of malicious Russian intelligence services cyber activity. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick)

The first page of the Joint Analysis Report narrative by the Department of Homeland Security and federal Bureau of Investigation and released on Dec. 29, 2016, is photographed in Washington, Jan. 6, 2017. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick)

The report said the Russian effort was both political and personal.

“Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton and harm her electability and potential presidency,” it said. “We further assess Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.”

Putin most likely wanted to discredit Clinton because he blames her for inciting mass protests against his regime in late 2011 and early 2012, and because he resents her for disparaging comments she has made about him, the report said. It said the Russian effort was the “boldest yet” intended to affect a U.S. election.

As Trump met in New York with intelligence officials for his briefing about Russia’s campaign, Congress tallied the Electoral College votes, officially confirming Trump’s November victory.

Trump has been dismissive of the intelligence agencies’ claims of Russia’s involvement for months, long before he saw the classified information Friday. After finally seeing the intelligence behind the claims of the outgoing Obama administration, he released a one-page statement that did not address whether Russia sought to meddle. Instead, he said, “there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election.”

The top U.S. intelligence official told Congress Thursday that intelligence agencies had no way of gauging what influence this meddling had on the outcome of the election. It was unclear Friday what evidence Trump had to support his claims.

According to the public report, when it appeared that Clinton might well win the election Putin turned his focus to undermining her presidency.

Trump acknowledged in his statement that “Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people” are consistently trying to hack U.S. networks, including the Democratic National Committee’s.

He said, as did the intelligence report, that “there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines.”

Trump said that as president he would appoint a team to develop a plan to “aggressively combat and stop cyberattacks.”

Before seeing the classified intelligence report Friday, Trump dismissed the assessment of interference and told The New York Times the focus on Russia’s involvement is a “political witch hunt” by adversaries who are embarrassed they lost the election. “They got beaten very badly in the election,” Trump said. “They are very embarrassed about it. To some extent, it’s a witch hunt. They just focus on this.”

The officials in Friday’s meeting with Trump in New York – Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan and FBI Director James Comey – also briefed senior lawmakers Friday morning. Obama received his classified briefing on Thursday.

A senior law enforcement official said the FBI in its investigation had repeatedly stressed to Democratic National Committee officials the importance of obtaining direct access to servers “only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated.” The official said the FBI had to rely on a “third party” for information, but eventually got access to the material it needed.

image_print

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Start your Free Trial for a limited time!